Humanist Perspectives: issue 206: I am compostable, therefore I was! OR

I am compostable, therefore I was! OR
My nana died, but she still brings me flowers on my birthday every summer!
by Martin Pariseau


aving participated in Humanist Officiant/Celebrant training here in British Columbia, as well as being familiar with various communities of seniors claiming secular beliefs, I have heard a few interesting stories about how people would like their mortal remains to be disposed of. The limited availability of areas in which to bury the dead, the increase in environmentally based values and a need for said communities to express their unique personalities in posthumous fashion have resulted in the following “food for thought.”

When corresponding with the widow of my favourite author, I was impressed with an essay she sent me prior to its publication. Note that she is a published author herself. She has also made a career in psychiatry while simultaneously, and therefore also ironically, demonstrating clear abilities for thinking outside of the eighty-four inches long box.

In the essay she shared with me, possibly published in an online version of the Humanist News at the time, she wrote the following words about alternatives to whole body burials. “Make each small pile part of the nutrition of gardens. With 7 billion people on Earth, rapidly increasing, we’re going to have to accept using our own waste products instead of dangerous chemical fertilizers. Why not accept crumbled dead bodies?”

She also mentions the benefits of homes with roof-tops that grow food – which I must confess is what I sleep under every night – and also that her suggestions would be applicable in space-stations and extraplanetary colonies. How can you find such options when shopping for your final resting place here in BC? Easy! As the illusion of Canadian democracy is, for the most part, consumer-driven, simply vote with your spending dollars. Research what laws exist (or not) in relation to this and then put your money where your mouth…uh...will be able to feed others!

Janet O. Jeppson Asimov was one of those rare individuals who was not prone to wearing a mask. She suffered, much like all other truly sentient life, in regard to the choices made by the norm. While I coined the term “suffering from species alienation,” she calls herself a curmudgeon. I define this word as sourced in, which says that “curmudgeons are mockers and debunkers whose bitterness is a symptom rather than a disease. They can’t compromise their standards and can’t manage the suspension of disbelief necessary for feigned cheerfulness. Their awareness is a curse.”

Myself, I cannot help improve society for future generations by spending money that my – mainly – philanthropic work won’t be able to generate. Instead, I have sent various documents that were, as usual, promptly ignored by more than a dozen corporeal Members of Parliament. Here is a quote from one such document where I define individuals who suffer from species alienation. “A person who suffers from Species Alienation might have relatively acute awareness of the state of the world…but…what does differentiate them (…even more…) is that they care enough about right and wrong to suffer immensely when seeing their fellow Human Beings facilitate the status quo and choosing to rationalize all sorts of excuses to avoid taking action. In essence, I suffer from Species Alienation because I care enough about doing the right thing.”

Janet ended her essay by saying that “...lots of people would pay to have their remains used to fertilize not only a Martian garden but even the vats of algae that would help humans survive. I would.” She was against hiding/dumping dead bodies and discouraged turning them into mantelpiece décor, decorative beads or, to cite Current Affairs, into supernatural travelling freak shows. She suggested, instead, that we use our remains in order to help life do what it naturally wants to efficiently do.

I end this essay by saying that, whatever your wishes are, make sure you appoint someone you can trust to help you make them a reality. If you are a Humanist, you would then have greater assurance that your final wishes would not be used to poison the living just because the living were well-domesticated at making choices that were poisonous both to themselves, as well as their children’s children. Therefore, your death would find you acting as a role model for being part of the solution and not the problem. And on that last note, for some of those performing artists in politics, I say to thee, better late than never.

Martin Pariseau is an ecocentric humanist. Ecocentric Humanism is a philosophy that rejects supernaturalism unless this supernaturalism serves a spiritual need in helping humanity reconnect with the global ecological system in which it evolved and still belongs. Ecocentric Humanism stresses an individual’s dignity and worth and capacity for self-realization through reason but not at the expense of other important components within Mother Earth.


Oh No! Genderology Wars!
by Dan Mayo (Issue 208)
It was bound to happen. Not long after Gender Unicorn became a well-established sex-ed teaching tool, Gender Elephant has appeared on the scene to challenge Gender Unicorn’s hegemony. Unicorn’s failing? Not sufficiently diverse and inclusive! A failing which is, as one says today, problematic.
John Stuart Mill and campus free-speech debates
by Clifford Orwin (Issue 207)
What would Mill think about the attempts on many college and university campuses to suppress certain speakers?...
The Stigmatization of Men Can Be a Humanist Issue
by Lloyd Hawkeye Robertson (Issue 208)
..... If a diverse sample of men reported a targeted imputation of character rendering them unfit for particular sorts of social interactions due to their sex or gender, then we could say male stigma exists....The purpose of my research was to determine whether male stigma exists and, in the course of doing so, describe it.....
Reflections Left: An examination of the evolution of a political movement
by Lloyd Hawkeye Robertson (Issue 212)
With the fable of Mouseland, the first leader of the New Democratic Party was attempting to describe Canadian democracy, and he viewed the NDP and its forerunner, the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) as fundamentally different from the two “old line parties,” Conservatives and Liberals. But is it?
by Gary Bauslaugh (Issue 211)
How should we respond to pseudoscience? We could simply dismiss it as irrational. But Darwin spoke of the need for an approach that seeks “the gradual illumination of minds.”...
Dancing with Shakespeare
by James Bacque (Issue 210)
When I was young and wondering about what to do with this precious life that had been given to me, I thought about becoming a writer. However, I somehow knew that if I did, I would also develop the habit of observing myself as I was living my life...
Editorial: Do you celebrate diversity (and mass immigration) or are you an unreconstructed knuckle-dragging bigot?
by Madeline Weld (Issue 206)
"Conservative Member of Parliament Maxime Bernier boldly stepped into a sacred cow patty on August 12th. In a series of six tweets, he questioned Canada?s ever-increasing diversity that he says will ?divide us into little tribes? and bring ?distrust, social conflict and potentially violence.?"

order a copy of this issue (206)

$7.50 CAD, to a Canadian address
$7.50 USD, to an address in the USA
$11.50 USD, to an address outside Canada/USA
To receive a free sample copy of a previous issue, send your address to: